From rotoworld.com: “The Royals and Brett Tomko have reportedly agreed to a one-year, $3 million contract. It's so ridiculous to complain about what Alex Rodriguez is making when baseball is swimming in so much cash that Tomko can disappoint organization after organization and still receive $3 million. The soon-to-be 35-year-old had a 5.55 ERA while pitching in two of the National League's bigger ballparks last season. Once in 10 years -- with the Giants in 2004 -- has he actually met the expectations a team had for him. There's simply way too much money being made by baseball if he's worth $3 million.”
Yes, Brett Tomko and countless others are underperforming, overpaid lucky bastards. But remind me – which came first – Tomko et. al making a few mil per year or A-Rod’s 10-year, $252 million deal? The truth is that Rodriguez’s contract is the one that caused Joe (Well Below) Average’s perceived value to increase for no good reason. If A-Rod had signed a contract that made him the highest-paid player in the game but only barely, maybe Tomko would be making closer to the league minimum for a veteran.


